Contents

Animation (Theory) as the Poematic: A Reply to the Cognitivists
by Alan Cholodenko

Download this article as PDF.
View this article in HTML.

Using chronophotography to replace Persistence of Vision as a theory for explaining how animation and cinema produce the illusion of continuous motion
by Paul St. George

Download this article as PDF.
View this article in HTML.

Revolutionary cels: The Sydney waterfront, Harry Reade and Cuban animation
by Max Bannah

Download this article as PDF.
View this article in HTML.

To Be or Not to Be: The Controversy in Japan over the “Anime” Label
by Sheuo Hui Gan

Download this article as PDF.
View this article in HTML.

Kinesic constructions: An aesthetic analysis of movement and performance in 3D animation
by Adam de Beer

Download this article as PDF.
View this article in HTML.

Complete Volume

The complete volume will become available for download as PDF by the end of the year.

A Reply to the Cognitivists

This essay has two projects.

The first is intrinsic to the very question of what constitutes legitimate scholarly inquiry in the study of film and of animation, marking out something ostensibly especially contentious in and for the study of the latter: theory. Proceeding from two related queries-Why theory? And why animation theory?-the paper offers responses based in and on my own theory-driven and theory-focused work.¹

The second project constitutes a reply to the cognitivists, or more particularly, those scholars who propound and promote a cognitive theory of film and especially of animation, notably, those who have wielded cognitivism as a weapon of total destruction against my work. Given the nature of the paper, this reply is of a general and in any case partial character.

Let me pause to say: I ordinarily do not respond to criticism of my work. But given where these criticisms have been published and their purport, I felt I have had to make an exception to my rule.

Read more… »